Looked at the new house
Mar. 6th, 2012 04:56 pmIt is beautiful, it is bigger, newer, and will suit our needs so much better than what we have now.
I'm still waiting to hear from the lawyer about a subject, though.
There are tax liens on this house for taxes we couldn't pay because of all the mufty-pufty. A lender is claiming those liens would follow me to the new house because a mobile home is considered "personal property".
The last we've heard from Bette and her lawyer consists of a single sheet of paper which says she was given the house on January 1, 2007. It is signed without a name printed below and it is not witnessed nor notarized.
Now here's my quandary -
I have a friend willing to cover those taxes for me and then I would pay them back. However, if Ms. Goldenring is claiming she was "given" the house in January 2007, that means that a grave mistake was made and it should have been put in her name - not mine. That also means that I do not owe those taxes, she does.
So, what I'm waiting to hear from the lawyer is whether I should have those taxes paid so I can go ahead and get out of here, leaving Norman and Bette to duke it out - or if we should press that she get the place in her name, making her liable for the back taxes, and taking them out of my name.
I can't wait very long. If there are any paralegals out there who wish to give a completely free and unbinding opinion, have at it.
I'm still waiting to hear from the lawyer about a subject, though.
There are tax liens on this house for taxes we couldn't pay because of all the mufty-pufty. A lender is claiming those liens would follow me to the new house because a mobile home is considered "personal property".
The last we've heard from Bette and her lawyer consists of a single sheet of paper which says she was given the house on January 1, 2007. It is signed without a name printed below and it is not witnessed nor notarized.
Now here's my quandary -
I have a friend willing to cover those taxes for me and then I would pay them back. However, if Ms. Goldenring is claiming she was "given" the house in January 2007, that means that a grave mistake was made and it should have been put in her name - not mine. That also means that I do not owe those taxes, she does.
So, what I'm waiting to hear from the lawyer is whether I should have those taxes paid so I can go ahead and get out of here, leaving Norman and Bette to duke it out - or if we should press that she get the place in her name, making her liable for the back taxes, and taking them out of my name.
I can't wait very long. If there are any paralegals out there who wish to give a completely free and unbinding opinion, have at it.